[FM Networks] [High Frequency AM]
In the 1940's David Sarnoff, the head of RCA, acted to protect his investments into AM radio networks by interfering with the growth of FM radio. FM radio was a threat for many reasons. One often cited reason was that the fidelity of FM radio was so good that it could be used to relay a broadcast from station-to-station without the use of (costly) leased telephone lines. Here are some comments on FM relaying by Edwin Armstrong, the inventor and promoter of FM radio. Armstrong suggests that FM networks could operate using separate FM "relay" stations (not by the direct reception of other FM broadcast stations as is commonly claimed). Here is an excerpt of testimony given on December 6, 1943 by Major Edwin H. Armstrong when he appeared before the Senate Interstate Commerce Committee.
Armstrong had made this statement: "... regulations by the Commission did hold up FM, and they are still doing so."
=========== start quote ===================The Chairman [Senator Burton K. Wheeler]: In what way?
Dr. Armstrong: The invention, Mr. Chairman, is 10 years old. There are still no channels assigned for relaying programs of FM about the country. It is one of the great developments which is surely coming, and that will be the relaying of FM broadcasting around the country without the use of connecting wires.
The Chairman: How did the Commission hold it up?
Dr. Armstrong: The Commission has never allocated a band of frequencies for that purpose, although the bands which could be utilized for relaying might be anywhere in a region as far up as 300 megacycles or more. They have had it under consideration, and perhaps if it had not been for the war there would have been something done about it, but nothing yet has been done.
Senator Hawkes: Dr. Armstrong, do you mean by that to say that they could have made these available to FM without interfering with the established channels at all?
Dr. Armstrong: Yes, Senator Hawkes. There are vast spaces up in the upper frequencies where, prior to the war, no stations whatsoever were operating.
Senator Hawkes: What have they given as a reason for not extending that privilege, or that license, to you for FM?
Dr. Armstrong: Informally that the existing allocations system provides for the allocation of these frequencies to television and Government, and that there is no space available. Now, that reason was given a good many years ago, when allocations were based on the theory that everything about radio was known for all time; that there was a certain limited amount of spectrum, and that it had to be allocated among the different services. But I think the engineering department of the Commission has gained wisdom since that time.
Senator Hawkes: Has gained what?
Dr. Armstrong: I think the engineering department of the Commission since that time has acquired much wisdom.
Senator Hawkes: It is to be hoped so.
Dr. Armstrong: And I believe that we will in the future have much more sympathetic treatment of that particular request for relay channels.
Senator Hawkes: But their position was at that time, when this hoped-for wisdom you are speaking about had not been acquired, was that they could not make those assignments without interfering with other assignments already made; is that correct?
Dr. Armstrong: Yes. That is, assignments which had been made over large areas of the spectrum, where you could take a receiver and listen from morning until night and never hear a station. There was plenty of room to put relays in. There was another reason why the relay broadcasting should have been put into use. It would have been years before any demand would have arisen for these channels for the purpose to which they were allocated, and by that time we would have learned how, through using these channels, to have moved the relay stations on up into the higher part of the spectrum, out of the way of the demands of some new service. As this art develops you see more and more the impossibility of making progress under the rigid allocations of the past, for they were made on the theory that there is a limited quantity or number of channels. That is the lesson I am trying to get across, by relating the experience of FM, of getting it underway; and while at the present time FM has escaped that danger, the danger of being blocked off, I want to assure the committee that I as an inventor am not anxious to run the risks again that I ran in undertaking to put this thing into use.
========== end quote ====================
The quote above and following commentary were provided by John Byrns:
Armstrong's complete testimony in this hearing is interesting in that he hasn't a clue about the importance of Television, suggesting that the FCC ought to set the development of Television aside, and develop FM first, then move on to developing Television once FM was established. Armstrong suggested that what at the time was Television channel #1, extending from 50 MHz to 56 MHz should be reallocated to enlarge the FM band so that it would extend from 42 MHz to 56 MHz, as he did not feel that the existing 8 MHz band would be adequate for a nationwide FM service. In the 1944/45 hearings before the FCC that determined the shape of the post war frequency allocations, there were many more different allocation proposals put forth. The result was of course that both the FM and the Television allocations were completely changed from what they had been before the war, with two of the existing television channels deleted to make way for the new FM band from 88 MHz to 108 MHz. The reaction of the public to Television demonstrated how naive Armstrong was in his views of the importance of Television.
On the other hand, Armstrong's idea of "FM relay" stations proved to be very insightful, as that is exactly what AT&T built all across the country after the war, but not for FM networking as Armstrong envisioned, but rather for Television networking! The FCC also allocated "FM relay" bands which were used by both AM and FM broadcast stations to link their studios and transmitters, and to extend other program links.
As Armstrong testified, the pre war FM band had been created from the original, pre 1940, Television channel #1, and Armstrong wanted the new, post 1940, Television channel #1 to also be reallocated to FM broadcasting, although he admitted in his testimony that FM broadcasting "can work in the higher frequencies", and also that the spectrum from 129 MHz to 200 MHz could be utilized for FM broadcasting, which is pretty much what happened after the war with the allocation of 88 MHz to 108 MHz to FM broadcasting.
Armstrong also gave as one of the advantages of FM broadcasting that FM stations could be spaced only 100 miles apart, while AM stations on the same channel had to spaced much further apart to prevent nighttime interference. 100 miles strikes me as very close spacing, especially considering the lower frequency in use at the time, even closer spacing than we have for class B & C FM stations today.
Reprinted with permission
from Radio Age 2004.
by Andrew Mitz
wideband VHF FM looked like a success until the FCC shifted the FM band up to
88-108 MHz, when suddenly all the FM receivers to date were useless, and the
listeners had to start anew. The
new FM receivers were relatively expensive.
And then, there was the nagging question asked by engineers: was it the
FM feature or the VHF feature that made Armstrong’s VHF FM so noise-free?
Are these the questions that a fellow named Sarkes Tarzian was trying
to address with his grand experiment, High-frequency AM, or HiFAM? [Ed.]
Sarkes Tarzian was a bright and motivated engineer
responsible for many important designs and patents.
He was born in
He founded Sarkes Tarzian, Inc. around 1944. The
company branched out both as a manufacturing and as a media entity.
The manufacturing was at one time an important contributor to the
Early in the history of the company, Sarkes Tarzian
tried an experiment in broadcasting. In 1945 he received permission from the
FCC to establish a high frequency AM broadcast radio station. The motivation
behind this scheme, dubbed Hi-FAM, is a little obscure.
FM radio had just been moved to the 88-108 Mc frequency band.
FM had been moved up in frequency to make room for more stations and
avoid the ionospheric skip conditions that plagued medium-frequency AM
stations at night (and to please Sarnoff, who thought the old FM band was
needed for his grand television scheme)..
Perhaps Hi-FAM was seen as a nice way to permit the proliferation of
local AM radio stations without the expense of transmitting or decoding FM.
Engineers were debating the reasons why the then-novel FM was so free of
static and noise, and one of the arguments claimed that the move to VHF
(either the 40-MHz band or the 88-MHz band, both are VHF) alone was enough to
eliminate most of the lightning and
spark-induced static. Economy was touted a significant benefit of the Sarkes
Tarzian experiment. Receiving
converters for regular AM radios were built into ice cream cans at a cost of
under $6 each.
Sarkes Tarzian paper tag
on bottom of radio. Note tuning frequency and strange IF of 3.3 MHz.
station went on the air in July of 1946 as W9XHZ.
This station broadcast everything from NBC recorded materials to local
news and poetry. Remote broadcasts
the time, I expected this to be an unusual FM radio.
Certainly the frequency of 87.75 Mc seemed to suggest FM, and Sarkes
Tarzian produced a large number of FM only radio sets in the 1950s.
FM only radios are my collecting specialty (see my web site at www.somerset.net/arm/fm_only.html),
and I was convinced this radio was intended for FM.
When the radio it arrived I carefully removed the chassis and took a
close look. To my amazement, the
radio appeared to be an “All American Five” AM radio converted over to the
FM broadcast band.
There was much to suggest that the conversion was
done on the cheap. For example,
the W9XHC printed label covered the original tuning dial hole and it had a
white plastic TV knob glued into the center.
A vacant spot revealed where a large tuning capacitor had been removed. A dial lamp was mounted just behind the label to make the knob glow when the power went on. All the (octal) tubes had their plastic alignment pins broken off. The broken alignment pins make sense if you posit that Sarkes Tarzian located a source of cheap octal tubes, ones with broken alignment pins. Each tube socket and one of the tubes had carefully painted red dots to mark alignment.
Was this an experiment that failed, or did it
actually work? What AM radio was
it originally? There were more questions than answers, so I got right to work.
I needed to find out about the original AM set.
I posted a request on my FM only web site and got a world of
information from Carter Cook, a collector in
Perhaps 90% of the Maguire 500 is unchanged in the
Sarkes Tarzian set. The Maguire is a marbleized plastic radio with a round
dial on the left, speaker on the right, and the tuning control above the
volume control on the extreme right front.
The case has a pleasing curve to the top and accent lines skirt from
the front around to the left side of the radio.
Electrically, the Maguire is a typical AC/DC five-tube superhet.
It uses a 12SA7 pentagrid converter, a 12SK7 IF amplifier, followed by
a 12SQ7. One plate of the 12SQ7
operates as the AM detector, a second plate provides AGC, and the triode
section capacitively-couples audio to the beam-powered 50L6GT pentode
amplifier. Power rectification is
provided by a 35Z5GT, which has a filament tap for the pilot lamp.
Inside of cabinet, where
Sarkes Tarzian had covered the dial opening and glued in a cheap knob.
Sarkes Tarzian made surprisingly few changes to the original circuit
design. The local oscillator coil
and tuning capacitor are replaced with a hand-wound coil and fixed capacitors
mounted on what appears to be the ceramic mount from a WWII surplus VHF tuning
capacitor. An extra tap was added
to the coil near the cold end for a small variable capacitor (WWII surplus VHF
tuning capacitor?). The variable
capacitor shaft provides a front panel frequency adjustment of about ˝ MHz.
The position of this tuning dial has been swapped with the original
volume control; the new tuning control now sits below the volume control so
its connection to the local oscillator coil is unobstructed.
An 18-inch insulated wire tail out the back of the radio acts an
antenna. It is isolated by a
capacitor, then couples to the input tank circuit with a 2-turn link winding.
The input tuned circuit replaces the original AM loop and 365 pf
section of the tuning capacitor. Like
the local oscillator circuit, the input circuit is a hand-wound coil with a
fixed capacitor. The AGC circuit
The IF amplifier has been shifted to 3.3 Mc.
The transformer cans are still marked “455 kc” and have not been
opened. I do not know if the
internal coils were rewound or replaced.
Converting an AM radio to 88 Mc is an amazing feat and making the
conversion with so few changes is even more impressive.
Presumably, Sarkes Tarzian was aware that the 12SA7 and its 6-volt
brother, the 6SA7 had been used in a number of pre-war FM receiver designed
for 50 Mc. For example, the
Stromberg-Carlson 425H and 505H use a 6SA7 converter and a 4.3 Mc IF.
Getting the 12SA7 to convert at 88 Mc is a bit more tricky, but
obviously doable. The Maguire was probably chosen for a number of reasons.
Perhaps one was its similarity to earlier FM designs.
An All-American five
lineup, but not an octal base key in the lot.
Every tube had the base key broken off, and one tube (and all the sockets) had red dots for insertion guides.
This is the 12SA7 region
of the under-chassis. Note the VHF coils, fixed ceramic tuning caps, and the
antenna coupling link in the middle of the RF coil (on the right). The
oscillator coil (on the left) is mounted on a porcelain insulator from a WW2
surplus variable capacitor.
A serious hum prompted some recapping.
The radio still has hum and the B+ is at 50 volts rather than the
expected 110 volts. I have not
determined if the converter is intentionally being run at a higher current or
if there is a biasing problem somewhere else in the set.
Regardless, the radio was able to pick up my signal generator at 88 Mc.
I temporarily added a series capacitor to the local oscillator to see
if I could receive a strong local FM station at 101.1 Mc.
I reasoned that FM slope detection should work with a strong signal.
With the antenna wire fully extended in the basement, our local station
come through with ease. Careful
adjustment of the tuning control made the FM sound quality similar to that of
the original AM Maguire set. After
almost 60 years, the Sarkes Tarzian was playing again.
With no RF amplifier and little front-end selectivity, however, the
strong local oscillator radiated 3.3 Mc above the receive frequency and wiped
out reception of a nearby radio. Certainly,
this arrangement is not for regular use.
The original version of
this article was written on the completely wrong assumption that the modified
Maguire radio was intended for FM. Geoff
Vargo of Sarkes Tarzian helped unravel the history of this radio.
He sent a few documents and in a kindly written letter he pointed me to
Ms. Kari Price, the executive director of the
The radio described here is one of only 27 sets built
for receiving the experimental station. From
the available accounts, the station did not stay on the air past 1946.
The official story is that Sarkes Tarzian decided to pursue television
instead. However, the FCC may have
decided that the Hi-FAM experiment was over.
Regardless, in 1947 there were a few hundred ice cream cans with
useless receiving converters floating around
Maguire (Model 500) side-by-side with Sarkes Tarzian radio.
A special thanks to Ed Lyon for editing this article for publication, and reformatting the article for this web site.
Further reading on the battles between Armstrong and Sarnoff
Here is an excellent bibliography
[HOME] [FM list] [Photos] [Converters] [Stereo] [Wanted] [Links] [Credits] [Clones] [Siblings] [Low Tech][FM vs AM]
Last updated 2 September 2010
Original site located at http://www.somerset.net/arm/fm_only.html by Andrew R. Mitz ; copied with permission.
(Mirror maintained by Mark Sherman)
All text, photographs, and other graphics are copyright (c) 1998- 2010 LTJ Designs.